![]() law enforcement agencies probing their purchases of private data sets to circumvent warrant requirements. Last month, House leaders sent a letter to U.S. ![]() The missive is the latest instance of Congress seeking to rein in the purchase of Americans’ personal data by law enforcement and intelligence agencies. The study found that ICE in the past decade has gained access to driver’s license and home address information for three-quarters of American citizens. Edward Markey, D-Mass., and Ron Wyden, D-OR., cited a Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology investigation into the use of data for immigration enforcement. In a letter sent to agency Acting Director Tae Johnson, Sens. cities, most notably San Francisco, have already banned the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement and public agencies, citing the need to preserve civil rights and its residents’ privacy.Democratic Senators on Tuesday called on Immigration and Customs Enforcement to stop using facial recognition and surveillance technology and to end the purchase of private information from data brokers. The Hill has reached out to the FBI for comment. This is an established procedure that is consistent with other law enforcement agencies.” “During the course of an investigation, ICE has the ability to collaborate with external local, federal and international agencies to obtain information that may assist in case completion and subsequent prosecution. “Due to law-enforcement sensitivities, ICE will not comment on investigative techniques, tactics or tools,” ICE said in a statement to The Hill. The findings are particularly salient as ICE agents across the country are cracking down on undocumented immigrants under the Trump administration. While it was previously known that the FBI has used federal and local databases for more than 390,000 facial recognition searches since 2011, the Post’s reporting shows the extent of the searches goes much further. They didn’t sign any waiver saying, ‘Oh, it’s okay to turn my information, my photo, over to the FBI.’ No elected officials voted for that to happen,” Jordan said, according to the Post. “No individual signed off on that when they renewed their driver’s license, got their driver’s licenses. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, said Americans have not given consent to use their photos for facial recognition searches. Last month at a hearing regarding facial recognition technology, Rep. “Law enforcement’s access of state databases,” particularly DMV databases, is “often done in the shadows with no consent,” House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) told the Post in a statement. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle expressed their dismay over reports that the federal agencies were using driver’s license photos. The photos give the agencies a new layer of information on Americans and a new tool to potentially track both criminals and those who have never committed a crime, according to the Post, which adds that Congress has not authorized any such development of a facial recognition system. The Washington Post reports the two agencies have used millions of Americans’ photos, largely from driver’s licenses, for the purpose of facial recognition searches, citing internal documents and emails from the two agencies that were obtained by Georgetown Law researchers over the past five years and shared with the news outlet. The FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have reportedly been using driver’s license photos for facial recognition searches without license holders’ knowledge or consent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |